| honw's profileIT recruiting diaryPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
May 31 分析年轻人性生活的成本-收益Dear Economist,
I am 17 years old and studying A-level economics. A lot of my friends are getting into serious relationships and I’d like to get a girlfriend myself, but I am also concerned about getting distracted from my studies. How does the cost-benefit analysis work out?
Ben, Buckinghamshire
Dear Ben, A lot of economists have been arguing about this. Social conservatives have recently argued that ”abstinence until marriage builds character and self-control.” More plausibly, as the economist Joseph Sabia suggests in a forthcoming article, ”if the realised benefits of sexual intercourse are higher than the ex ante anticipated benefits, adolescents may substitute time and energy away from investments in human capital and towards investments in future obtainment of sex.” In English, that means that sex may be distracting because it is surprisingly fun. There is little doubt that virgins achieve better grades. Yet is this because sex kills brain cells, or because kids who are already bored at school look harder for ways to amuse themselves? Professor Sabia’s article in Economic Inquiry uses data on the timing of the decision to have sex to show that kids who decide to have sex were already doing badly at school. Professor Sabia’s results show that a girl does not seem to be distracted at all by losing her virginity - perhaps because young boyfriends are not competent enough to be terribly distracting. Be careful, though, because it’s different for boys. Professor Sabia finds that deciding to have sex will knock a few percentage points off your grade. That’s my excuse for doing so badly at maths, and I’m sticking to it. 译文:
|
亲爱的经济学家: May 22 Build your "personal equity" to become a great recruiterGreat recruiters have four critical traits that create trust and respect, or "personal equity", according to international recruitment expert, Kevin Wheeler. The first trait: Intimate business knowledgeWheeler gives the example of a recruiter who has "been there" and worked in the industry in which they recruit, saying these people have a good mental map of the skills, competencies and experience levels that would be appropriate for most of the positions.But he says if you don't have this background, "you can still gain this expertise by showing interest in the work your hiring managers do". He says you should spend time with them to show that you grasp the essentials of their output and needs. As well, Wheeler says, "talk to 'star' performers to figure out what they have that makes them successful, read annual reports, talk to people who know the organisation's strategy, and keep yourself fully informed about changing business and technology conditions. You have to be able to have an intelligent and informed conversation about the products, business, and issues that your hiring managers face." The second trait: Relationship with the hiring managers"While most of us cannot be technical experts in the areas we recruit for, we can spend the time to become acquainted with the hiring managers," Wheeler says."We can sit in on their staff meetings and we can be with them when they grapple with tough decisions." Wheeler says, "we may have to invite ourselves on occasion, but after a while, we will be part of their team." He says that to be branded as someone who understands the needs of hard-working managers is "the highest form of personal equity you can acquire, but it takes work and time to develop." The third trait: Focus on the right candidatesWheeler says great recruiters learn how to source and focus on the right candidates. They don't spend time screening candidates who are long shots or poor fits; they use their knowledge about where the kinds of people they are after tend to be found and go there to find them.He gives the example of a recruiter who knew the engineering hiring managers he worked with liked people with an automotive background or at least with an interest in cars. "That became a key screening criterion, not the only one for sure, but an important one. He asked candidates about cars and assessed their interest and skills in working on cars." Wheeler advises you to find out the traits and characteristics that tend to be influential in getting hiring managers interested in a candidate, and leverage that knowledge. "A good sourcer is a great networker, someone who spends enough time with hiring managers to really know what they need and want in a successful employee." The fourth trait: Sell both the candidate and the hiring managerFinally, Wheeler says great recruiters are able to speak to candidates in their language and assess them against the criteria they know will really count to the hiring manager. "[A great recruiter is] able to take the complex soup of corporate culture, hiring manager personality, technical skill needs, and candidate desire and sell both parties on success."He says you should take the time to develop a deep understanding of the environment. Know what pressures and goals managers face, then find candidates who could help them overcome the pressures or achieve the goals. "Good recruiters can make those pressures look like exciting challenges to a candidate and infuse enthusiasm for the candidate's abilities in the hiring managers." Wheeler says: "Personal equity is what sets you aside and exceeds what might be expected. No one gains trust or equity without a track record of results and without working at building relationships. "It takes hard work to build up your equity. It is not something won in a day or a month or often even in a year. It takes determination, study, knowledge, and practice. But the payback is huge." You can read Wheeler's article in full here: Become a Great Recruiter: How to build trust and success. 给新加入招聘行业的人!"The five things I wish I knew when I started in recruitment": Ross Clennett
There are five things industry trainer Ross Clennett wishes he knew when he started out in recruitment. Here, he shares his experience so you don't have to waste time or make the same mistakes. 1. Clients lie."Clients don't mean to lie and they don't maliciously lie, but they lie all the same," Clennett says.Common lies are, "I'll call you with feedback tomorrow"; "Of course I'm not listing this job elsewhere"; and "There aren't any internal candidates up for this role". Clennett says he soon learned to be "optimistically cynical". He advises you to: "hope for the best but make plans and take action expecting the worst". 2. Candidates lie.Clennett says that again, these lies aren't deliberate or malicious.The lies include: "That employment gap was due to overseas travel"; "I haven't got any other interviews"; "I am flexible on interview times"; and "The job is more important than the money". Clennett says the most effective way to deal with candidates not telling you all the accurate, or complete, information you need is to "speak to them more regularly, ask questions, and assume nothing". 3. Action speaks louder than wordsClennett says he learned that, "thoughts and knowledge make very little difference to results"."Results are caused by action, day-in and day-out action. The most effective action is seeing people face-to-face. The next best is talking to them and at the bottom of the list is emailing them, talking about them or thinking about them." 4. It's all about you."No matter what company I represented, no matter how good my glossy brochure was or how impressive the company branding was, success in recruitment is fundamentally about me building trust and credibility on a one-on-one basis, with both candidates and clients (and with a lot of them, not just a few of them!)," Clennett says."There are no short cuts or magic tricks. Nobody can do it on your behalf. You have to stand or fall on your own efforts." 5. Be clear who your ideal customer is and then go find them.Clennett says that early on, he wasted many hours interviewing inappropriate candidates, and prospecting to clients who were "a waste of my time".He says: "Once I clearly identified my target market, and the more accurately and persistently I pursued them, the more success I had. Being a generalist recruiter (as an individual) is for mugs." Clennett says: "Recruitment is simple, but it's not easy. There's a big difference. "Once you work out your own simple rules for success and follow them it's amazing how much better your results become with much less time, effort and stress. Find yours and stick to them every day." May 10 A call for recruiting leadershipLeadership is hard to define. One might say, "I know it when I see it, but I can't tell you exactly what it is." We have all probably worked for good leaders — people who inspired us, excited us, or challenged us. And, we have also all worked for good managers — people who carefully directed us, followed the process, met the numbers, and always followed through. Both are good. Both are necessary. And rarely do they come combined in a single package.
Recruiting is full of managers. These are the people who run their recruiting organizations efficiently and effectively. They implement processes, cautiously install technology, focus on customer satisfaction, and on staying within their budgets. As long as the world doesn't change too much, they thrive. But times are changing. As I have documented in many articles, we are in the midst of a talent shortage that challenges organizations in every country. I am currently in New Zealand where shortages or medical staff and engineers are already creating social and economic issues. The same is true in Australia and China, both with booming economies. What makes all of this even more difficult to deal with that it is happening at the same time we are glutted with unqualified candidates. search,staffing,headhunting,headhunterThe solutions are not simple and we need recruiting and HR leaders to come forward with new ideas and visions on how to end this talent shortage. It will require leaders with the willingness to take risks to build powerful talent machines. All of the traditional tools of recruiting will come under scrutiny, and the entire function may be snatched out of the hands of recruiters and put into new hands — hands perceived as capable of meeting the challenges that organizations will face. I see already a number of recruiting functions led by people with marketing or operations backgrounds — not human resources or recruiting. Here are three of the changes that will be forced upon us. Are you a leader ready with creative ideas and perhaps some solutions? Challenge #1: Develop and, thereby, retain selected current talent. will be asked to help identify everyone within your organization who has the capability and motivation to acquire new skills. And, it is very likely that you will also be asked to help them acquire those skills. Challenge #2: Compete with a distinctive brand and sell a set of qualities that are substantially different from those of any one else.It will probably not be possible to only say you are better than others in your industry or better than your competitors. You will have to find ways to clearly be perceived as different or better than everyone else if you want to attract the best people. Cisco had a philosophy a few years ago of attracting only the top 10%. To execute on this, it established leadership in sourcing creativity and actually invented many of the practices that are more or less commonly used today. These include having an interactive website, a candidate profiler, and the use of technology and email. It will take continued and continuous experimentation and constant upgrading of technology to get the attention of the best. Yet, few organizations that I am familiar with have even achieved recruiting parity, to say nothing about excellence, in their own industry. Most of the recruiting world is firmly embedded in 1970 or 1980 and is just beginning to realize the value of recruiting websites, on-line screening and assessment, recruiting image and brand development, and the need for integration of development and acquisition functions. Challenge #3: Work with your organization to do more with fewer people.Recruiting and talent development folks have rarely been asked to get involved in this area, which has been left to organizational development or organizational excellence people. We all need to be clear that well-defined organizations that can flexibly change to meet customer needs will be the ones that survive. These organizations will be focused on talent, and indeed paranoid about their people. The best-in-the-world firms will know that their core of highly talented, well-compensated employees will be able and willing to take advantage of technology, experiment with new approaches and castoff what doesn't produce results as a matter of course. Many of the surviving dot-coms are leading the way. They are developing people who can move internally easily as needed because they have broad skills, are not tied to org charts and titles but to executing as needed. Many management theorists such as Charles Handy and Peter Drucker already see the decline of the hierarchical, relatively inflexible organizational forms of the 20th century. The integration of many fields — Organizational Development, HR, recruiting, development and psychology — will be the core set of disciplines that will lead our profession forward. We are sorely in need of individuals who can be leaders — not managers — and take the risks, inspire their staff and creatively move us into this century. May 07 关于JAVA软件框架选择的一些感受-----就像娶老婆这些日子在网上和生活中看到不少对JAVA框架选择的一些争论,看到不少不同的意见。
对于开发框架的选择,感觉框架没有好和坏的分别。并且进几年JAVA WEB开发框架层出不穷,表示层的、持久层的,非常多。STRUTS\SPRING\HIBERNATE这些可能是目前国内最流行的几个框架了,其次是JSF了,聪明的开发人员都是用每个框架的混合搭配在一起,优势互补,诸如JSF的表现层,HIBERNATE的数据持久层处理等。无所谓单一的框架使用。
抛开技术层面,我们使用框架的目的是为了减少工作量(提高代码的复用性)、低成本、高质量的完成产品(项目)。个人认为最重要的还是速度、质量和成本问题,一个好的软件组织,我认为能在速度、质量和成本上达到一种平衡,诚实的说,目前国内大多数的软件企业都很难达到这种境界,可能大多数企业是满眼的BUGS,项目不能按其交工,人员质量问题等等。 I、速度。开发速度是框架选择的一个主要因素,一个很小的MIS,如果选择STRUTS,将简单业务逻辑的分割,本身就是一个复杂的工作,对于一个初学者反而会增加难度,所以目前国内JAVA WEB的开发,提到框架就是STRUTS我是不太赞同的。虽然目前国内STRUTS中文文档相对于其他框架中文文档多,但是一定要取决于项目,而不是资料,当然资料固然重要,但是框架本身的开发速度和质量更重要。
II.成本。在项目或者产品的开发中。框架的选择决定着成本投入的多少,表面上看来,项目的价格似乎是市场人员谈妥的,但是一个优秀的市场团队,必须深知技术成本,根据项目经理的建议来估计成本和决定价格。开发周期和人员投入应该是框架选择成本的重要部分,因为目前的框架都是FREE的。
III.质量。目前较多的多框架综合利用,对技术人员JAVA技术基本功要求较高,不再是以前单一的技术了,所以在配置和耦合方面要求提高了,多框架的综合利用,怎么去选择其中合适框架的优势,并开发利用,相互没有冲突。重要的是判断开发框架的应用范围和适用性。
建议在选择框架的时候不要为了框架而去做项目,需要的是根据项目去选择框架,框架无所谓好与坏,重要的是适合自己最好,就像娶老婆一样(如果你没有结婚,就赶快去找,结婚了就知道了)。
与你分享五年HR招聘与面试的体会做HR专职招聘也有好几年了,最近感觉这个话题越来越热,从HR专职招聘的角度谈些有关招聘面试的问题,也尽自己的能力给有这方面需要的朋友们些建议,回答大家的问题,抛砖引玉,与大家交流。
第一个问题,面试中你的角色 招聘方和应聘方始终是一对矛盾,这毫无疑问,但这两者又何尝不是合作关系呢?试想有哪个做招聘的不希望又快又准得给自己的公司找到合适的人选,又有哪个应聘者不希望能尽快通过面试获得工作机会完成自己职业生涯的又一次跃进呢?所以,作为应聘者的我们千万不要从一开始就觉得HR是站在你的对立面的,如果你站错了队伍,你的面试基本上也就结束了。因为你将竭尽所能得去回避自身存在的、你认为可能会对工作有所影响的问题,而不是将自己的能力展现出来,所以在面试中最重要的工作是表现,而不是回避(To Show not to cover!) 绝大多数应聘者在面试之前会做准备,看很多面试经验,我也看(HR也不傻,当然琢磨对方会怎么对付面试,呵呵)。这些所谓面经中有一条很重要的就是要你去弥补自己的短处,其实这是一个很大的误区。举例来说,我面试的很多应届毕业生跟我大谈自己的工作经验,甚至在哪家打字复印店打过字都说得像个项目管理工程;反过来,那些大专中专毕业,工作两三年,面试始终喜欢说自己自考本科在读,夜大在上,很快就要拿到**大学**文凭……实际上,这些基本上都是无用功,想想吧,公司为什么让你来面试?如果我需要一个有工作经验的,看了你应届毕业生的简历,我要你来面试干什么?我要找个学历高的,这年头,本科生硕士生满天飞,我约你来面试那肯定是我时间多的没地方打发了! 所以,面试中最重要的就是表现你的优势,而不是弥补你的弱点,因为公司用人,只用人的长处,不是找三好学生,不是样样都优秀才算人才! 第二个问题,展现什么样的能力 今天说在招聘面试时最需要展现什么样的能力,HR专业的说法非常复杂,什么能力模型、素质结构、职业倾向……同行之间讨论一下没问题,真拿到实际工作中,别说应聘者头晕脑涨,有时候连招人若渴的部门经理们都觉得不耐烦。 1、展现你不可被培训的能力
道理很简单,能力、素质分两种,可以培训的和难以培训的,你自己就完全可以判断。 测试:英语口语、能吃苦耐劳、诚实、善良、沟通能力,了解公司产品知识,公司所在行业熟悉程度、计算机能力、财务知识、工作主动性、协调能力、分析能力……试试看,区分一下,是不是很容易? 你是用人单位,你会把注意力主要放在哪儿呢?当然是不容易培训的能力! 公司有培训部门,要做的事情就是针对员工有所欠缺的地方进行雕琢,所以,不要怕自己在可以培训的方面有缺点(比如对公司产品知识不了解等)。而更多的是要抓住自己所应聘职位所需要的难以被培训的能力。 2、展现你不可被替代的能力 作为招聘者,我每天都在做选择题,在众多应聘者之间筛选出符合甚或是超出我们期望的那一个,而我每天看到的绝大多数简历都可以说是千人一面。最典型的是毕业生,英语四级(六级)、计算机二级(三级)、成绩优良(排名3/50)、连续n年获得奖学金、参加**学生组织、在**公司做过几个月的实习工作。这样的简历要多少有多少,换句话说,只要公司想招,随时有长龙排在门口,你成功的机会微乎其微。 换个角度看着问题,为什么基层员工好找,部门经理、技术专家难招呢?原因在于替代性,你越容易被替代,你的价值也就越低,这就是法则。所以无论是简历还是面试,你得把自己独特的不可替代的能力表现出来,别告诉我没有,这不可能,不然你凭什么来应聘? 第三个问题,面试成功的要诀,你的预期=我的表现 面试,英文叫做Interview,我认为含义完全不同。面试,当面进行考试,根据你的成绩客观给出评定,考出多少分是多少分,其目的是择优而用;interview翻译过来应该是面谈,会面,是一个沟通的过程,interviewer向应聘者就公司的业务状况,所能提供的职位详情进行传达,而candidates向对方介绍自己的履历、能力、经验等各方面信息,从而让对方认识自己,进而了解自己。其目的是双方的契合,不是择高分而用,而是提供一个机会,让双方都能找到最适合自己的合作伙伴。 具体来说,interview之前,企业一定会对自己想招一个什么样的人来做这个职位分析,也就是HR理论中的所谓岗位分析(Job Description)。这个分析来源很广泛,由部门经理对这个职位的需求,有前任工作者给公司就这个职位留下的主观映像,甚至有客户对该职位人员的客观评价等不一而足。 所以,interview的结果没有所谓优秀、一般、差,只有suit or not suit。希望大家知道企业方的面试官(我们姑且沿用面试这一通行说法吧,不然有人该埋怨我说话夹杂英文了),在面试之前是带着期望来的!什么样的期望呢?简而言之,比前任更适合!如果前任做得不好,希望招到一个更好的,如果前任做得很好跳槽了,则希望招到一个更适合(稳定)的。 那么怎么才能做到让自己更适合公司的期望呢?
1、研究对方的招聘广告,一般对方会在广告中写出职位的工作内容,任职要求。对比一下自己,如果对方写了大专以上学历,你是个硕士,就别去瞎起哄,耽误大家时间嘛这不是?如果对方写了三年以上工作经验,对方当然就不会想去从大学毕业生开始培养一个新手,基本条件都不合适,让你去面试,不是对方闲得实在无聊就是对方HR是个新来的菜鸟。 2、面试中注意把握对方的心态,说俗点儿,听话听音,对方一国企,做财务,问你英语水平怎么样,就得多个心眼儿,工作用不着啊,就别天花乱坠的吹一通,没准儿你的前任就是英语好跳槽去了外企!这样上当的不能说不多,反正我常碰到。 3、突出重点,我常碰到这样的应聘者,通常毕业一两年,会议室坐下,二话不说,从包里翻出一大堆本本,有多大桌他就能给你铺满了,英语的、会计的、贸易的、报关的、计算机的、营销的、管理的、公关的……看得我眼花,只有你想不到,没有他拿不出,介绍完了,我弱弱的问一句您应聘什么职位?答曰:“我觉得你们公司很好,外企,大品牌,心向往之不是一两年了,只要能进来,什么职位我还真不在乎!”我看他做我们总经理挺合适的…… 第四个问题、面试中HR们的心态和对策 我们不妨从HR招聘者的职责描述说起,简而言之,为企业寻找合适的人才。当然有许多限制: 1、时间,招聘周期按照职位高低从两周到三个月不等,平均为一个月 2、成本,招聘过程会发生很多成本支出,只要不是糊涂到花多少钱不在乎的地步企业一定非常关心自己招人花费几何 3、招聘效果,也是最重要的,你找来的人是否能够在公司里做得好,做得久,公司个人各得其所,双赢为赢嘛 而这些限制本质上是矛盾的,又想招到最合适的人,又要快,又要省钱,压力当然巨大。所以,其实HR在看似怡然自得坐在面试桌另一边的时候,一般心里都处在这样的矛盾挣扎之中,一方面,心中期望自己对面坐的就是那个最佳人选,另一方面,又担心由于自己一时不慎,没看破对方小小的应试伎俩,被人结结实实的忽悠一把。 这就是HR面试中的心态,针对这种状况的应对措施似乎我不该多谈,表现要不要好?当然要,而且在专业领域内要在众多面试者中首屈一指,但是面试经验我劝各位还是少看些比较好,你想,如果你碰到一个经验不十分丰富的HR,他所准备的问题你都有了比他还精准的答案,HR会得出什么样的结论呢? 第四个问题、面试中HR们的心态和对策 我们不妨从HR招聘者的职责描述说起,简而言之,为企业寻找合适的人才。当然有许多限制: 1、时间,招聘周期按照职位高低从两周到三个月不等,平均为一个月 2、成本,招聘过程会发生很多成本支出,只要不是糊涂到花多少钱不在乎的地步企业一定非常关心自己招人花费几何 3、招聘效果,也是最重要的,你找来的人是否能够在公司里做得好,做得久,公司个人各得其所,双赢为赢嘛 而这些限制本质上是矛盾的,又想招到最合适的人,又要快,又要省钱,压力当然巨大。所以,其实HR在看似怡然自得坐在面试桌另一边的时候,一般心里都处在这样的矛盾挣扎之中,一方面,心中期望自己对面坐的就是那个最佳人选,另一方面,又担心由于自己一时不慎,没看破对方小小的应试伎俩,被人结结实实的忽悠一把。 这就是HR面试中的心态,针对这种状况的应对措施似乎我不该多谈,表现要不要好?当然要,而且在专业领域内要在众多面试者中首屈一指,但是面试经验我劝各位还是少看些比较好,你想,如果你碰到一个经验不十分丰富的HR,他所准备的问题你都有了比他还精准的答案,HR会得出什么样的结论呢? 1、这人面试经验丰富,时刻准备跳槽,稳定性值得怀疑 2、这人性格特点看不透,有待进一步观察,看看有没有更合适的人选吧 所以,回到最初的地方,面试的过程是展示,而不是去掩饰,你遮盖了一些东西,HR就会认为你有更多东西没有表现出来,进而对你整个表现的可信性产生怀疑,得不偿失啊!再说句到底的话,凭借面试经验是有可能糊弄一些半路出家的HR,可是你找到了工作事情就结束了吗?做起来发现这工作不适合你怎么办?发现工作对你的要求超出或明显地与你的能力不协调怎么办呢?最终结果还是要放弃,不如在面试时真诚沟通,让HR看透你点儿其实对你有帮助! 第五个问题,做一块过硬的敲门砖----简历
制作简历,这一步看似简单,其实也是有些窍门的 三不写二多写一少写 大家猜一下,HR简历筛选时,阅读你的简历会用多长时间呢?十分钟?那是我一共就这一份简历,五分钟?一般候选人在面试前他的简历会被这样研究。一分钟?那是这封简历写得挺逗。正确答案,不会超过三十秒!这是我的自身经验,同行们的意见可能更少! 这么短的时间能阅读多大篇幅呢?注意我没说阅读多少字,最多两页A4。学校教育害死人呐,学生们的简历毫无例外的第一页是“求职信”。内容基本雷同,大体是大学生涯、母校光辉……除了校友和菜鸟,其他人是不会看的。你怎么才能让HR被你的简历吸引呢?切记,三不写二多写一少写! 不写未成年经历,做简历不是写生平,公司选人不是政府选国家干部。一般我们对你小时候的事情兴趣不大,小学、中学就读学校之类,没人会看。很多人觉得好像写了也无关痛痒,其实不然,这样的经历一般都出现在简历开头部分,看了一段这个,会严重影响HR看下去的意志力,那就亏大了! 与工作本身不紧密相关的工作、学习经历不写,运气好,HR视而不见,运气不好,他们就会考虑,这个人能力挺杂啊,放我这儿不能人尽其才,来了也会跑! 不写自我评价和真正意义上的兴趣爱好,自己都评价完了,HR还评价什么呢?菜鸟会觉得你傲气,有经验的则不看,写了只有坏处没好处。如果你写的是与工作相关的兴趣爱好,(比如应聘采购地说喜欢逛街购物,应聘财务的说自己酷爱数钱之类,开玩笑啊,学生朋友可别当真),那没问题,如果你写的是我爱唱卡拉OK、泡吧跳舞、打球打牌,我看算了吧。 直接相关的工作经历要多写,你最能吸引公司的关键能力就是这条,能不多写吗?我看得很多简历都有很好的,甚至是我公司直接竞争对手公司工作经验,但非常可惜,就一句话“从****到****在****公司任职****,证明人***”,你自己都认为你在这公司这几年的工作经验毫无亮点可说,怎么吸引别人呢? 成功案例数据要多写,记住一句话,事实永远比空谈有说服力,什么样的事实呢?成功案例。其实根本不用你从头到尾地把整个案例背景、困难、压力、你的措施、执行、结果都写出来,你只要提纲携领地把事件描述一下就可以了。如果能多写出两三个成功案例,你这个人的能力还不跃然纸上?尤为重要的是数据,这是最有说服力的,比如,我要应聘一家公司的招聘经理我一定会列出数据,我多少年专职招聘经验,阅读**简历,组织过**次面试,招聘到经理级员工**,主管级**,其中**是通过**途径招到的,等等这样的数字,很快就会让你的描述可信度大幅上升。什么?你记不得了?Faint! 你不会根据自己的情况估算一下?唉 参加的项目要少写,我看过不少这样的简历,作了**年销售,经验丰富,业绩优良,参加广交会,做成**项目,为企业创利几百万元……人才啊!赶紧回头看看薪资要求,RMB2500/month! 这人不是忽悠我吧,就算百分之一的奖金也有好几万呐!于是菜鸟说,骗人,扔!其实我知道,他确实是去参加了广交会,也正经八百的坐在了他们企业的摊位前面(旁边坐着项目负责人),生意谈下来了,说不定他还为了这笔生意拼了一回酒,闹了个现场直播呢!于是这也就成了他的经验,堂而皇之的写在了简历上。多大的误会!实在想写,您就提一句得了,记得说清楚了是参加! 第六个问题,投递简历,电话初识,你的第一印象
好了,现在我们有了一份合格吸引人的简历了,很多朋友开始满世界搜寻招聘信息,然后只要是符合自己专业或兴趣的二话不说就给他来一份,这样的简历投递方式有效吗? 答案是否定的!投简历的过程非常容易被忽略,认为这其实是非常细小的问题。其实不然,这是整个应聘过程中你给公司的第一印象!心理学知识告诉我们,初见简历就像我们在生活中认识一个人,第一次见面留下的印象很大程度上决定着你是否愿意跟他交谈,而你投简历最直接的目的就是希望获得面试机会,你说这是不是重要? 我在工作中平均每周收到几百封简历,真可谓无奇不有,说几个常见的例子吧。 有不少简历居然是cc给我的!什么意思呢?我给别人投简历,应聘任家单位的职位,听说你这儿也要招人?你也看看吧,如果那家公司我谈不拢,我们可以再聊聊。还能有比这更糟糕的第一印象吗?反正我注意到很多HR都是直接click delete……就想考大学第二志愿没人要一样,找工作,一般人家也不喜欢第二志愿的!所以,一封邮件只发一封简历ok? 比cc好一点儿,有很多简历一眼看过去就知道不是给我一家公司的,e-mail内容整个儿一瓶红花油,哪儿都能抹。可能大家从网上找来这样的格式一看,不错,新鲜,找工作的信是这样写的啊!用了!可是,可怜可怜我们HR吧,你看了是新鲜,我们看了都要吐了,04年的时候,我记得网上出了个挺有名的求职信,你就看吧,应聘简历里面千篇一律,使用率高达33.33%,05年毕业生流行写诗,一时之间,学生诗歌蜂拥而至,有些还真是文采颇佳,读之怡情也就算了;有些打油诗,逗个乐子,还能忍受;狗皮不通的顺口溜也来凑热闹!晕啊,这又是什么样的第一印象呢? 所以你的简历不能是应聘大军里的一个小兵,没人会注意大海里的一滴水的!要针对对方的招聘信息适当修改简历再寄出去。内容方面前文写过了,毋庸赘述,e-mail里面至少写上,短短两句话,如:近日通过**渠道,了解到贵公司正在招聘**职位,窃以为本人工作经历、专业特长颇为相合,特冒昧应聘**职位云云……别看这两句话简单,立刻你就甩掉了一大批人,那些只知道重复点发送键的人,你是认真考虑了公司职位要求和自身条件才投简历的! 另一种第一印象是电话约见,一般会由HR的人来做,内容大体上就是我们看了你的简历,认为你的基本条件是符合我们职位要求的,希望你能在某日来公司参加面试……看似简单,但其实应聘者的表现也还是有高低参差之别的。
接电话的技巧,不好的印象类型有三种:前倨后恭、不知所云、太过依赖。 前倨后恭,中华礼仪之邦,向来是以理为先的,可是偏偏倒了现代,似乎崇礼之风日下,表现在电话这个看不见对方的场合里尤为过分。英文接电话用hello也就是你好,跟日常朋友见面打招呼的言语一样;再看我们,居然创造性的发明了个“喂”,这其实非常不礼貌,你想,谁在路上跟别人打招呼直接喊声“喂”的啊?更有甚者,这一声“喂”的语气有多种含义表达(感谢祖先发明的四声),可以表示应答、疑问,这还说得过去,还可以表示质问、挑衅、不耐烦,这给人的第一印象就不能再坏了!有点啰嗦,实际情况是这样的 “喂!” 我:“你好,是***吗?” 答:“是啊,你谁啊?” 我:“我是**公司的,你是不是给我们公司投了简历?我们觉得你条件不错想请你来面试。” 答:“噢,是的是的,不好意思,不好意思,在开会(上课,吃饭,车上,等等借口不计其数)。” 那拒人千里之外的开场白实际上已经为祸不轻了,再加上你一百八十度的态度转变,你想能给对方留下什么印象呢? 第二种叫做不知所云,还是用电话内容来说明 “喂,你好。” 我:“你好,是***吗?” 答:“是啊,您哪位啊?” 我:“我是**公司的,你是不是给我们公司投了简历?我们觉得你条件不错想请你来面试。” 答:“**公司,我没投过简历啊?”(开始恍惚,难道我投的?) 我:“应该不会吧,你用****e-mail邮箱发过来的。” 答:“邮箱是我的,那应该是我投得没错,你能告诉我,我投的什么职位吗?”(眩晕,真的经常有这么问的,估计投得太多了) 我:“你投的是**职位,可能时间有点儿长吧,你还对这个职位感兴趣吗?” 答:“我应该有吧……”(我狂倒) 最后一种情况常见于应届毕业生 “喂,你好。” 我:“你好,是***吗?” 答:“是啊,您哪位啊?” 我:“我是**公司的,你是不是给我们公司投了简历?我们觉得你条件不错想请你来面试。” 答:“噢,好啊,没问题,非常感谢!呃,对了,你们公司在哪儿?” 我:“请记下我们公司地址****” 答:“好的,我记下了,呃,不好意思,我怎么过去?” “我在**地方,做什么公交车能到?” “你们公司那儿有什么标志物?” “我到你们公司说是来应聘的就行了吧?” 你可能觉得问地址甚至问怎么走都无可厚非,可实际上这些信息你都是可以自己主动获取的。你给对方的感觉就是你依赖心理特别强,以后交件事情给你做你也会问:“我该找谁帮忙?他电话多少?我找不到***该怎么办?”之类的问题,与其都解答你,还不如我自己做,你的工作能力又从何处体现呢? 第七个问题 面试在告诉你之前已经开始 先说个故事,故事关于被誉为中国近代史上最后一个能成大事者的曾国藩。一日,曾文正公(曾国藩谥号,“文正”是古代中国文官最高规格的谥号,清代一共13位曾国藩是最后一个)在家读书,突然接到圣上口谕,入宫见驾!老板找!那还不赶紧穿戴整齐,有点儿像面试啊,朝服笔挺的就进宫了,被太监带着来到故宫某花园一个亭子里面。“在这儿候着”,太监说完走了。曾国藩,穿戴整齐也不敢坐着,就那么等着,时值盛夏,热啊(北京的桑拿天估计那会儿就开始了)那也得忍着不是?板等了一下午,傍晚,又来个太监,说皇上口谕,“回去吧您呐”,曾国藩一头雾水,也不能问啊,就回家了。到家越想越郁闷,吃了晚饭就去老师家串门,向师傅说起了这件事儿,问及是福是祸啊?师傅沉吟半晌最后问他:“亭子上的对联写得什么?”曾国藩说当时心里又慌又乱,左立不宁,没仔细看。师傅说:“赶紧的,去找个太监,给几百两银子,让他给你抄出来,准没错!”于是曾国藩照办,第二天上朝果然皇帝问他那亭子里的对联,寓意如何,曾国藩对答如流,当即,放外省巡抚,上双眼花翎,赏……明白了吧?敢情皇上跟这儿情景面试呢!要不说中国上下五千年历史浩瀚如海呢? 看这个故事是不是跟今天的面试有点儿像?从你已进入人家的视野,面试就已经开始了,我通常会在面试之前跟应聘者聊几句,比如,做什么交通工具来啊,口音不是本地人啊,家庭情况啊,认不认识我们公司什么同事阿,怎么知道我们招聘信息的啊,等等,其实这都是面试中不太方便收集的信息,但是确实有用,所以实际上这已经是面试的一部分了,回答起来要跟面试一样谨慎!问你交通工具或家住哪里是希望了解你家离公司有多远,如果超过一小时路程,上班以后打算怎么办呢?问你家庭情况是了解你的稳定性,两地分居?父母年纪大在外地而且你是独生子女?孩子年纪小?等等都是问题(在这儿我们不谈所谓就业公平性,从心里我是非常希望职业公平的,但是社会现实不鼓励公司这么做,这不是我们能控制或改编的,有兴趣的朋友不妨另贴讨论)。具体职位还会导致一些别的问题。 再说等待。等待面试的时候你都做什么呢?据我观察大多数人是干坐着,超过70%,有些人则参观,有些人读书,有些人找前台聊天,这其实也都能反映性格的。前问我说过了,性格没有优劣之分,比如做销售的如果干坐着就会被打问号,为什么不利用这时间了解些信息呢?总的来说,起来四处看看没什么坏处。 第八个问题,招聘中的经济学问题 这里集中的论题就是:你和公司应该谁求谁?这不是一场辩论,而是一个经济学问题,实质上很简单,就是最简单的供求关系模型。我们普遍认为公司应该求贤若渴,这当然正确,用我自己做例子,我做招聘经理大部分时间都是在为公司追逐人才(那些牛人),因为他们可以为公司创造很高的价值,n顾大酒店的事情也是少不了的~~~;或者我们换个说法,我是在为那些有能力为公司创造高价值的人才们服务,因为如果他到我的公司来工作,可以更好地体现自身能力,得到更高的社会价值和自我价值认同。 这是一个问题的两个方面,招聘工作就是这两方面的统一体,所以招聘和应聘双方是一种包含相互斗争的合作关系,不存在谁求着谁!当然追逐一定是存在的,原因很简单,追逐的那一方将获利更多而已。这不就是销售、采购模型的最典型表现吗?所以,大家在抱怨企业不“求贤若渴”的时候,不如首先考量一下双方的供求关系,到底倾向哪一方。 对于刘备和诸葛亮的关系,我们不妨用供求关系理论分析一下刘备作为人力资源的需求方(买方)和诸葛亮作为人力资源供给者(卖方)之间的关系。刘备当时寄人篱下,上无遮顶片瓦,下无立锥之地,武将关长赵云,文臣不外简孙二糜,再加上年纪不饶人,当时的刘备已经46岁了(古人的平均年龄我不敢妄段,但活到六十就算长寿是肯定的),还被人追杀的东跑西颠,不可谓不穷困潦倒;再看孔明,年方26,饱读诗书尝自比管仲乐毅,将鸿鹄之志,布衣躬耕于南阳,与其说是隐士还不如说是待价而沽、择优而侍的智者,江东一帮闲能之士(不是贤,是有闲又有能)谓之卧龙先生,并奔走相传:“卧龙凤雏,得一可安天下!”我们不谈双方合作的深层次原因(其实也是相互需要),至少双方的供求关系是明确倾向供给一方的,在这样的情景之下毫无疑问,刘备会去追逐孔明,而不是相反。试想,为什么去顾诸葛亮的是刘备而不是曹操,甚至不是与诸葛亮沾亲带故的刘表(诸葛亮的岳父是刘表的连襟)呢?很简单,他们还没穷困到要自降身价,去见那个26岁,没有工作经验,传说自学成材,连个文凭都没有的毛头小伙儿那个地步! 有人会反驳,那是因为刘备这个老板特殊,他对人才始终求贤若渴。真的是这样吗?在刘备具有荆州之地以后,安天下的另一位凤雏先生庞统前来报道,他是怎么做的呢?“备鄙其颜色(嫌人家长的丑),又闻能治,遂安一县令”怎么突然人才观就转变了呢?很简单,没那么饥渴了~~~~~~ 所以,如果你是一牛人,能力强到鲜有竞争对手可以匹敌,出来求职?捣什么乱,好好在家待着,自然猎头会上门找你的;如果你很不幸可替代性比较强,那就得向人家刘备前辈学习了,成功?你还得先努力!第九个问题,细节决定成败 前文已经表达了一个观点,面试不是考试而是用面谈的方式交流沟通,宾主双方进行气氛友好的亲切会见,目的是相互了解,以求共赢!可见,无论对于面试官还是应聘者交流沟通是面试中最重要的工作,那么交流沟通从什么时候开始呢?从简历开始!贯穿整个招聘过程,其间任何时候,任何事件都可能对最终结果产生致命影响!其步骤如下:制作简历、递交简历、电话约见、面试之前、面试过程、面试后问题。步步关键,条条致命,不可不察也! 那么什么是求职成败的决定问题呢?有人说是实力,这当然毫无疑问,实力不济,其他免谈。我们这里讨论的是候选人的实力相当的情况,这时候什么会决定成败呢?细节! 细节有多重要呢?最好的例子在战争和经济学中。 经济方面,例子多得是不胜枚举。如果大家有心也有空,推荐一本书,《细节决定成败》,早前看过,印象很深的是上海地铁德国人设计的一号线和我国设计师仿制设计的二号线的细节差别决定了经济效益上一号线比二号线好很多。 战争方面典型的是国人没齿难忘的中日甲午海战,我曾去过广州邓世昌故居的纪念馆,里面有甲午海战全过程描述,简而言之,中国海军是在总体力量上强于日本海军的情况下惨败,主力战舰基本下海,有经验的水兵基本丧失殆尽,实在是近代中华没落的最后一根稻草啊!具体过程我们就不多说了,就提几个细节。战备期,日本海军最高指挥官伊东亨佑参观我海军舰队的时候发现我国水兵在战舰大炮上晾晒衣服;战前北洋水师查处了与日本人有关的假冒伪劣炮弹事件;战中,北洋水师的信号兵犯了错误,舰队排错了队形(先摆了个大乌龙);还是战中,水师鱼雷兵计算错误让致命的鱼雷从人家旗舰肚子下面划过……还觉得人家侥幸吗? 那么具体到我们的简历上,什么样的细节会决定成败呢?前面说过,HR初选时阅读简历的时间不会超过30秒,如果很不幸看到了你一个明显不好的细节问题,丢丢的可能性是在是非常巨大的。举例:你的简历打开word红绿杠杠满天飞;你的错别字明显;明显表述错误,比如性别不确定,2082年出生(no笑,真的有);改别人的简历没改干净;时间重叠,学习和工作期间、工作期间重叠;中英文简历不对称…… 来自:网络 May 05 放假的时候感觉假期如此漫长,收假的时候发现假期如此短暂,原来什么也没有干今日无事,每天假期最后一天,忙玩就准备开工上班。总结如下: 放假的时候感觉假期如此漫长,收假的时候发现假期如此短暂,原来什么也没有干。 又到睡觉的时候了,熄灯,睡觉! |
|
|